There’s no excuse for any disunity or internal conflict
between anarchists.
Some regard it as a sad inevitablity that factions will
always develop and squabble with each other, but that doesn’t have to be the
case.
We are not in the same position as the Marxist left, where
different groups are (theoretically at least!) vying to form the leadership of
post-revolutionary government.
Our aim is simply to reach a certain point where anarchy has
been achieved and then allow freedom to take its course.
We could term this point, or line, the Anarchy Threshold.
All of our efforts go into taking humanity across this finishing tape. After
that, it will be the actions and ideas of the people who find themselves in
that happy situation that will take things forward from there.
We have no idea when we will reach the Anarchy Threshold and
whether we as individuals will be around when that time comes.
If we are there, we will have our say as to how the new
society is shaped – as individuals like everyone else. If we aren’t, we won’t.
We really don’t have to worry about that. All we need to
worry about is getting there in the first place.
Of course, there are many different ideas about how we can
best reach the A-Threshold – almost as many as there are different anarchists.
It’s understandable to want to try and persuade other anarchists to see it your
way – but only up to a point.
Ultimately, none of us know which will prove to
be the most worthwhile approaches and certainly a diversity of tactics is the
most likely strategy to succeed.
As far as the post-Threshold world is concerned, none of us
will have any control over how that looks, and neither, as anarchists, could we
desire to have any.
The views of other anarchists as to what that world might look
like do not represent any threat to us, as they cannot – by anarcho-definition
– be forced upon us or upon anyone else.
Your idea of utopia may not be the post-industrial
eco-anarchist vision, but that vision (as a vision held by anarchists) is not
going to be imposed on you or on society.
Neither will industrially-minded
anarcho-communists be in a position to force anyone to work in a collective
factory or down a collective coal mine. That’s not what anarchy means.
In the meantime, we will continue to express our diverse
daydreams about the world we would like to live in, but the
differences between them and other anarchists’ dreams should not be the focus of
our anarchist identity.
It’s not a prevalent belief in today’s world that all
government and authority is more harmful than helpful, and that the whole
set-up should be scrapped. Put that together with our common condemnation of
all forms of inequality, injustice and intolerance, and there’s plenty there
for anarchists to unite around.
So what’s stopping us? Ego perhaps? A sense of personal
“identity” derived from belonging to certain sub-sect? All that needs to burned
off and left behind.
We need a strong and clear anarchist movement made up of strong
and clear individuals whose political focus is purely on helping humankind reaching
the Anarchy Threshold and who have unwavering faith in the freedom that lies
beyond.
No comments:
Post a Comment